The New York Times
The New York Times (NYT) is a newspaper published in New York City and distributed worldwide. It is generally thought to promote an extreme leftist point of view. Former editor Jill Abramson admitted the paper had an "unmistakably anti-Trump" bias.
Declining in popularity and credibility, The New York Times is the third most widely circulated newspaper in the United States behind and The Wall Street Journal and USA Today. The paper is noted for its frequent inaccurate statements related to Christian and Catholic beliefs and practices. In recent years the paper has been criticized for its openly racist and anti-Semitic viewpoints, and it has promoted far-left historical revisionism regarding U.S. history. It has also opposed free speech.
The paper has been derisively referred to by its critics as the New York Slimes due to its intentionally sleazy, libelous, fact-twisting and factually devoid articles and left-wing political and ideological bias in support of advancing liberal narratives.
- 1 Aligned with DNC
- 2 History
- 3 See also
- 4 References
- 5 External links
Conservative organizations have stated that the Times promotes the homosexual agenda because it employs homosexuals and wins praise from homosexual groups. In 2001 Richard Berke, the Times' national political correspondent, revealed that "on any given day, three-fourths of those attending the daily meeting where it is decided what will be on the front page of the Times, are likely to be 'not-so-closeted' homosexuals."  In 2004, the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD) gave the New York Times an award for "Outstanding Newspaper Overall Coverage", specifically citing journalist Frank Rich's article attacking President Ronald Reagan's record on AIDS.
In 2008, ABC journalist John Stossel claimed: "The reason the Times, and to a lesser extent the Post, are so important, and they are, is because the TV and radio - all of the media - copy it sycophantically. That's how bias at the Times becomes bias in other media."
Examples of types of liberal bias utilized by the New York Times include:
As further reflection of the newspaper's liberal bias, it has been awarded the most Pulitzer Prizes of any newspaper. Leaked internal conversations have revealed many NYT staffers as what one conservative journalist called "parodies of hypersensitive liberal journalists."
Aligned with DNC
- See also: 2020 Presidential election
After the failure of the Mueller Report, The New York Times founded The 1619 Project in August 2019 to serve the Democrat Party's's objective of falsely painting Donald Trump as a "racist" as a key issue for the 2020 presidential election. The 1619 Project claims that the United States was founded in the year 1619 A.D. on the basis of "racism".
In 2012 again the "public editor" of the New York Times, Arthur Brisbane, accused his employers of harboring progressive bias on topics like same-sex "marriage" and the Occupy movement. Its publisher, Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr. has denied the paper's extreme leftist bias, claiming instead that the paper has an "urban" viewpoint.
Racism and hate groups
In August 2018, the newspaper defended a racist, misandrist, anti-police and anti-Trump editor it had just hired, and it even defended her racism. In a blatant display of liberal double standards, while this editor's racism was directed at white-skinned people, the NYT immediately fired another editor only a few months prior for anti-black and -gay tweets, even though that instance was not as severe as the former.
In January 2019, The New York Times wrote a sympathetic profile of Black Hebrew Israelites, a racist hate group, treating them significantly better than a group of Catholic students wearing MAGA hats, who it demonized.
Two 17-year-old Indian boys allegedly used racial slurs against a group of African-American girls and urinated on one during the game at Lawrence High School. By making race a "social construct", the racist actions of non-white people can still be blamed on white people. New York Times columnist Nell Irvin Painter, wrote that the Indian boys were “enacting American whiteness through anti-black assault in a very traditional way.”
In August 2018, reporters at The New York Times and other publications received word Tesla founder Elon Musk was relying on Jeffrey Epstein to advise him on whom to consider hiring as board chair or chief executive. Editors at the Times sent business columnist James Stewart to talk to Epstein. "I wondered why would Musk, if this is true, be using a registered sex offender to recruit new members to the board," Stewart told The Kicker, a podcast from the Columbia Journalism Review. Stewart wrote, "He said that criminalizing sex with teenage girls was a cultural aberration and that at times in history it was perfectly acceptable."
Stewart was not the editors' first choice to interview Epstein further. Initially, they had asked Landon Thomas Jr., a veteran financial correspondent who had been at the Times for 16 years. Thomas knew Epstein fairly well — having first written about him in 2002. For a 2008 profile, Thomas had traveled to Epstein's private isle in the U.S. Virgin Islands. The article largely presented Epstein as someone who solicited prostitutes, not committed sex crimes against minors. Federal agents had by then identified several dozen possible victims. The piece ran just before Epstein submitted to authorities in Florida for incarceration. It included this passage: "As his legal troubles deepened, Mr. Epstein gazed at the azure sea and the lush hills of St. Thomas in the distance, poked at a lunch of crab and rare steak prepared by his personal chef, and tried to explain how his life had taken such a turn," Thomas wrote. "He likened himself to Gulliver shipwrecked among the diminutive denizens of Lilliput."
After Epstein's death the paper reported on a public apology by one of its corporate directors, Joichi Ito, who had landed millions of dollars from Epstein for the institute he leads, the MIT Media Lab. In a tweet, the paper's media editor, Jim Windolf, said that Ito had sought funds from Epstein "a few years after Epstein got out of the Palm Beach County Jail."
The New York Times was first published as New-York Daily Times in September 1851, and is often referred to as the Old Grey Lady.
In 2005, Professor Laurel Leff of Northeastern University published her seminal history of The New York Times titled "Buried By The Times: The Holocaust And America's Most Important Newspaper" wherein she documented the newspaper's catastrophically failed coverage of the fate of millions of European Jews barely existing under the tyrannical and despotic rule of the German Nazi regime.
She goes into detail how the decisions that were made by The New York Times ultimately resulted in their minimizing what turned out to be modern history's worst genocide—and whose cause of doing so she traced to its publisher Arthur Sulzberger—who, while millions of European Jews were being slaughtered, sent a memo to all of his reporters stating: "I have been trying to instruct the people around here on the subject of the word ‘Jews’, i.e., that they are neither a race nor a people, etc."
During the atrocities, over 11,000 articles were published. But of those, merely 26 were about the Holocaust. To make matters worse, those articles that did actually get published were small, and buried deep and low in the paper below advertisements. One of the worst examples was an article titled "Warsaw Fears Extermination", which was so poorly written and spread apart that it was difficult to understand fully what the article was about.
Soviet crimes against humanity
- Main article: Holodomor
In 1931, Times correspondent and Soviet sympathizer/propagandist/collaborator Walter Duranty intentionally covered up the Soviet genocide of the Ukrainians. Duranty not only helped conceal all evidence of Holodomor, but also called other journalists who reported on it "liars". The lack of knowledge of this genocide was observed by English writer George Orwell, who commented "huge events like the Ukraine famine of 1933, involving the deaths of millions of people, have actually escaped the attention of the majority of English Russophiles". The Soviets managed to cover this up until Ukraine’s independence in 1991. Official Soviet documents recently declassified revealed that the genocide was indeed intended to target the Ukrainian people.
Most Americans who have visited Red China are accused of arriving at their judgements according to previously held prejudices. None denies, however, that in Communist China they have found matters of law and order, public health, equitable distribution of food and wealth, and other operations of Government carried out with greater earnestness and success than elsewhere in China or in most of Asia. . .
Another certainty is that the idea they represent, the hope they hold for the landless, overtaxed Chinese peasant, is not one that can be destroyed by force. . .
By 1956, during the Three Years of Disasters, U.S. Ambassador Joseph C. Grew commented,
The appalling figures on murders committed by the Beijing Communist government are neither propaganda, exaggerations nor guesses. Since the Communists drove Chiang Kai-shek and the Nationalists off the mainland in 1949, official accounts in Red newspapers have listed the executions of millions of Chinese. . .
. . . The real total of Chinese deaths administered by Beijing probably would total a great deal more than the estimates. Few Chinese marked for death by Beijing had a chance to escape their executioners. The Communists masked their real intentions with a deceptively mild, restrained and orderly entry to power.
The front page of the New York Times on April 18, 1959 read, "Premier Fidel Castro of Cuba denied today charges of Communist influence in his regime. In a speech before the American Society of Newspaper Editors he asserted: 'I have said very clearly that we are not Communists...our revolution is a humanistic one'". In an editorial later, the Times commented Castro "made it quite clear that neither he nor anyone of importance in his Government so far as he knew was Communist or in agreement with communism."
On May 23, 1959, on the front page, the Times recorded the following: "Extremists have no place in the Cuban revolution, Premier Fidel Castro said in a television interview....In the same broadcast the Premier dashed hopes of United States sugar interests to save their properties from seizure under the new land reform law." An editorial in the same issue the Times declared: "It is encouraging to see Premier Fidel Castro of Cuba facing up to the Communists as he did in his television interview . . . The aims of the Cuban Reds, with their links to Moscow and their totalitarian philosophy, were bound to be contrary, in the long run, to the aims of the 26th of July movement, which fought for democracy, freedom, social justice and - rather unhappily - for an extreme nationalism."
After Castro seized power, on July 16, 1959 the New York Times front page carried a story by Herbert L. Matthews:
This is not a Communist revolution in any sense of the word and there are no Communists in positions of control. This is the overwhelming consensus among Cubans in the best position to know and this writer subscribes to that opinion after searching inquiries and talks with Cubans in all walks of life and with many Americans....On December 2, 1961 Castro announced that he was forming:
There seem to be very few in Cuba - and one need have no hesitation in saying this - who believe Fidel Castro is a Communist, is under Communist influence or is a dupe of communism...
There are no Reds in the Cabinet and none in high positions in the Government or army in the sense of being able to control either governmental or defense policies. The only power worth considering in Cuba is in the hands of Premier Castro, who is not only not Communist but decidedly anti-Communist. . .
Premier Castro is avoiding elections in Cuba for two reasons. He feels that his social revolution now has dynamism and vast popular consent, and he does not want to interrupt the process. Moreover, most observers would agree that Cubans today do not want elections. The reason is that elections in the past have merely meant to them the coming of corrupt politicians seeking the spoils of power.
a "united party of Cuba's Socialist revolution," a monolithic organization like the Soviet Communist party with restricted membership....[He] acknowledged that he was a Marxist-Leninist and said that he was taking Cuba down the path to communism. He maintained that the world, too, "is on the road toward communism." . . .I am a Marxist-Leninist and will be one until the day I die".Castro added that by 1953, three years before his insurrection in Cuba, his political thinking "was more or less like what it is now." Herbert L. Matthews after his days as a reporter in Havana was promoted to the Editorial Board of the New York Times.
- When on March 8, 1983 Ronald Reagan called the Soviet Union where people were routinely sent to Gulags an "Evil Empire", prominent liberal intellectual Anthony Lewis of the New York Times commented two days later that the speech was "primitive...simplistic theology" and "a mirror image of crude Soviet rhetoric". But when news of the speech reached Natan Sharansky, confined to an eight-by-ten foot cell on the Siberian border, the reaction was different: “Tapping on walls and talking through toilets, word of Reagan’s 'provocation' quickly spread throughout the prison. We dissidents were ecstatic. Finally, the leader of the free world had spoken the truth — a truth that burned inside the heart of each and every one of us.”
Fabrications and scandals
- In 2003, Times reporter Jayson Blair resigned after it was found that he had engaged in repeated plagiarism and deceit, copying articles from other newspapers and fabricating information.
War on Terror
- Michelle Malkin says the NYT has violated an agreement regarding journalists covering war casualties.
- The New York Times subsidized what Peter D. Feaver of the Boston Globe referred to as a "vicious" attack on the person and charter of a respected professional soldier, Gen. David Petraeus. The radical liberal group MoveOn.org, an organization which advocated maintaining the corrupt United Nations Oil For Food program's support for the fascist Ba'athist regime in Iraq, ran a full page ad in the Times at roughly half the cost of regular price impugning Gen. Petraeus credibility as a traitor.
- The New York Times is known to defend America's enemies, discount terrorist acts or present stories as not to offend Islamic feelings, as with the case of American students who carried out suicide bombings in Somalia. In the NYT article "A Call to Jihad, Answered in America," the issue was a "crisis of belonging," "They want to belong, but who do they belong to?" Then the author states that these jihadist were "born-agains" or "fundis", not how the rest of America describes Islamic fascism.
Boston Marathon Bombing
After much liberal media speculation that the Boston Marathon bombing was caused by right-wingers  or tea-partiers, it was discovered that the bombing was done by two Islamic brothers. At that point, the liberal media became very sympathetic toward the bombers, who killed two women and a child, then shot and killed a police officer. The New York Times wrote a piece excusing their actions since they grew up in a bad country (Chechnya).
Coverage of the Military
Like everything else liberal, supporting America's fighting men and women is a burden for the paper. If it is a sensitive matter that would endanger the lives of our troops, they dismissively shrug the concerns off and post photos of American troops abusing prisoners in Iraq. In a liberal 'cause for concern', a New York Times reporter was kidnapped in Afghanistan by the Taliban, December 2008. The Times colluded with all the news organizations to keep it secret, not to endanger the reporter.
|“||The Associated Press and most other Western news outlets respected a request from the Times to not report on the abductions because the publicity could negatively affect hostage rescue efforts and imperil Rohde's life.||”|
By 2020 the New York Times still existed in print editions and on newsstands, which was convenient given the toilet paper shortage which, in part, was caused by the CCP global pandemic.
- The New York Times Best Seller List
- Articles about New York Times from previous "Breaking News"
- American Democracy Project
- Morton, Victor (April 28, 2019). Cartoonist whose work was pulled by New York Times had pattern of anti-Semitic tropes. The Washington Times. Retrieved April 29, 2019.
- Spiro, Amy (April 29, 2019). Cartoonist Behind 'NYT' Caricature has History of Controversy. The Jerusalem Post. Retrieved April 29, 2019.
- Boyle, Matthew (April 29, 2019). New York Times Prints Another Anti-Israel Cartoon Amid Antisemitism Scandal Rocking Newspaper. Breitbart News. Retrieved April 29, 2019.
- TimesWatch: Documenting and Exposing the Liberal Political Agenda of the New York Times
- Just Say It, Dan Okrent, National Review
- Kurz, Howard (January 2, 2019). Former NY Times editor rips Trump coverage as biased. Fox News. Retrieved January 3, 2019.
- Mass, Warren (January 3, 2019). Former Top Editor Jill Abramson Notes Anti-Trump Bias at New York Times. The New American. Retrieved January 3, 2019.
- Hemingway, Mark (April 19, 2019). New York Times hits new low with mortifying Notre Dame correction. New York Post. Retrieved April 22, 2019.
- Daniel Pipes. Twitter. August 18, 2019. Retrieved August 20, 2019.
- Byron York. Twitter. August 19, 2019. Retrieved August 20, 2019.
- Bokhari, Allum (October 6, 2019). Bokhari: The New York Times Declares War on Free Speech. Breitbart News. Retrieved October 6, 2019.
- Multiple references:
- The New York Slimes at TownHall.com
- Re: The New York Slimes at the National Review
- NEW YORK SLIMES: Paper Targets Nikki Haley For Expensive Curtains At State Department - Which Were Bought By Obama Admin at the Gateway Pundit
- The New York Slimes
- The New York Slimes - All the lies that are fit to print
- The New York Slimes
- The New York Slimes Hates White People
- The New York Slimes | The Ben Shapiro Show Ep. 663 at the Daily Wire YouTube channel
- The New York Slimes at the National Security Roundtable
- Totaling at least 106.
- Flood, Brian (February 15, 2018). Internal conversation paints triggered New York Times staffers as ‘parodies of hypersensitive liberal journalists’. Fox News. Retrieved February 15, 2018.
- Graham, Tim (June 3, 2017). NY Times Public Editor Signs Off Warning of 'More Partisan' Press 'Delighting in the Chaos' of Trump. NewsBusters. Retrieved June 4, 2017.
- Shelbourne, Mallory (June 3, 2017). NYT public editor hits legacy outlets in final article. The Hill. Retrieved June 4, 2017.
- Multiple references:
- Flood, Brian (August 2, 2018). New York Times stands by new tech writer Sarah Jeong after racist tweets surface. Fox News. Retrieved August 2, 2018.
- Caplan, Joshua (August 2, 2018). NYT: New Hire Sarah Jeong ‘Regrets’ Professing Hate for ‘Dumbass F*cking White People’. Breitbart News. Retrieved August 2, 2018.
- Richardson, Valerie (August 2, 2018). NYT defends newly hired opinion writer with history of anti-white tweets. The Washington Times. Retrieved August 3, 2018.
- Duke, Selwyn (August 3, 2018). NY Times Stands by New Editor Who Sent Vile Anti-white Tweets. The New American. Retrieved August 3, 2018.
- Vespa, Matt (August 3, 2018). Stay Classy: New NYT Editorial Writer Apparently Has A Problem With 'Dumba** F**king White People'. Townhall. Retrieved August 3, 2018.
- Marsh, Kristine (August 2, 2018). New York Times hypocrites knowingly hire racist writer who wants to '#CancelWhitePeople'. Fox News (from NewsBusters). Retrieved August 2, 2018.
- Athey, Amber (August 3, 2018). NYT's Sarah Jeong Also Sent Anti-Cop, Anti-Men Tweets. The Daily Caller. Retrieved August 3, 2018.
- Houck, Curtis (August 3, 2018). Of Course: Racist NYT Editorialist Also Wrote Tweets Attacking Men, Police. NewsBusters. Retrieved August 3, 2018.
- Richardson, Valerie (August 6, 2018). NYT's embattled Sarah Jeong: President Trump is 'basically Hitler'. The Washington Times. Retrieved August 7, 2018.
- Starr, Penny (August 6, 2018). Black Conservatives Speak Out Against NY Times Hiring ‘Racist,’ ‘Vulgar’ Sarah Jeong. Breitbart News. Retrieved August 6, 2018.
- Ma, Ying (August 7, 2018). The new face of racism is an Asian woman blinded by identity politics. Washington Examiner. Retrieved August 7, 2018.
- Multiple references:
- Re, Gregg (February 14, 2018). New York Times hires writer to cover 'consequences of technology,' fires her for tweets hours later. Fox News. Retrieved August 2, 2018.
- Nolte, John (February 14, 2018). NYT Discovers Its Latest Left-wing Editorial Writer Befriends Nazis, Calls People F*gs. Breitbart News. Retrieved August 2, 2018.
- Athey, Amber (August 2, 2018). NYTimes' Newest Hire Sent Tons of Anti-White Racist Tweets. The Daily Caller. Retrieved August 2, 2018.
- Adams, Becket (January 24, 2019). New York Times gives friendlier coverage to actual hate group than 'MAGA'-teens. Washington Examiner. Retrieved January 24, 2019.
- Nolte, John (January 24, 2019). New York Times Blistered for Sympathetic Portrait of Black Nationalists Who Taunted Covington Kids. Breitbart News. Retrieved January 24, 2019.
- Speaking of Shameful History: Mark Levin SLAMS NYT for Burying Holocaust
- New York Times Statement About 1932 Pulitzer Prize Awarded to Walter Duranty
- Ukrainian Congress Committee of America
- Robert Conquest
- "Notes on Nationalism" in "The Collected Essays, Journalism and Letters of George Orwell" (London, 1968), Vol. 3, p. 370.
- Foster Hailey, New York Times Magazine, (December 22, 1946), pp. 40-41.
- Joseph C. Grew, Invasion Alert! (Baltimore, Maran Publishers, 1956), pp. 42-44. 
- R.J. Rummel, Reevaluating China's Democide to be 73,000,000, November 20, 2005.
- Adams, Becket (September 9, 2019). New York Times deletes glowing Mao Zedong tweet, claims it lacked 'historical context’. Washington Examiner. Retrieved September 9, 2019.
- Fr. George Rutler. Recollections of Reagan. Pewsitter.com. “Many of our cultural elite were uncomfortable when on March 8, 1983 he called the Soviet Union an “Evil Empire.” Anthony Lewis of the New York Times said the speech was “primitive...simplistic theology” and Henry Steele Commager of Columbia University called it “the worst speech ever given by an American president.” But when news of the speech reached Natan Sharansky, confined to an eight-by-ten foot cell on the Siberian border, the reaction was different: “Tapping on walls and talking through toilets, word of Reagan’s ‘provocation’ quickly spread throughout the prison. We dissidents were ecstatic. Finally, the leader of the free world had spoken the truth — a truth that burned inside the heart of each and every one of us.””
- Jayson Blair: A Case Study of What Went Wrong at The New York Times
- The NYTimes’ unspeakable violation
- Subsidizing Sedition, Investor's Business Daily Editorial, 9/13/2007.
- MoveOn's McCarthy moment, By Peter D. Feaver, Boston Globe, September 11, 2007.
- Time Gives Lefties a Hefty Discount for "Betray us" Ad, Charles Hurt, New York Post, September 13, 2007.
- A Call to Jihad, Answered in America New York Times July 11, 2009
- New York Times Reporter Held Hostage by Taliban in Afghanistan Escapes Fox News, June 20, 2009